Stop hiring designers until you read this.

Cut Your Hiring Platform Fees By 60%+

Most freelance platforms charge 20% combined. goLance charges 7.95% total — you absorb it, pass it to your freelancer, or split it.

Hire Smarter on goLance (sponsored link)

────

I just built a clickable landing page mockup in 47 minutes.

No designer. No agency. No Figma file passed around for weeks (thank G*d)).

Just me, Claude Design, and a screenshot of a page I like.

Meanwhile, most founders are still treating landing page testing like it's 2019.

Yes, really.

They hire an agency, wait six weeks, blow $15K on something they're not even sure will convert.

Then they launch it, watch it flop, and start the whole cycle over again. Meanwhile, your new competitors are testing five different page concepts before you've even gotten your first draft back.

The game has changed. Time for you to catch up.

Zero-Based Web Design Prototype Budgeting

Here's what's killing your velocity:

• You're paying for polish before validating the concept
• You commit to one direction instead of testing the 3 you know will probably do well… you just don’t know which exactly
• Agency timelines. enough said
• You're treating mockups like final deliverables instead of cheap experiments
• You don't know how to give clear creative direction because you are not a designer, so you over-pay to compensate

Sound familiar?

Good news: you can now test landing page concepts in hours instead of weeks. The catch? You have to know how to use the tools correctly.

Let me walk you through how I do it.

Step 1: Be a Good Client, Not a Designer

Here's the biggest mindset shift founders need to make.

You're not trying to be a designer. You're trying to be a great USER.

Designers spent years learning visual language. You don't have that time. So stop trying to describe "modern minimalism with bold typography." It's not going to work.

So instead, I use Claude Design & let it do most of the work for me.

Here’s a walkthrough (be sure to leave a like & a comment!):

IMPORTANT: I always take time to build a clear content brief first. Otherwise it’s crap in, crap out.

In Claude Design, I start by pasting a screenshot of a landing page I love.

Claude reads it and matches the look and feel automatically. Way faster than trying to describe what "clean" means.

Then I make Claude ask me what it needs in order to make it better: "What should I tell you so you can do this right? Ask me questions"

Stop trying to be the artist.

Be the client who gives crystal clear examples, and get AI to ask you questions.

Step 2: Prompt the Mockup Right

Here's one prompt structure that works pretty well:

"Build me an interactive HTML mockup for a [product] landing page targeting [audience]. Conversion path: hero, social proof, one call to action. Sections: hero, social proof bar, problem section, three-feature grid, single CTA, pricing, FAQ, footer. Match the visual energy of [URL]. Make it clickable: buttons, hover states, real layouts. Before you build it, tell me what three things you'd cut from this list to make the page convert harder. I want your editorial opinion, not a yes machine."

That last line is the unlock.

It forces Claude Design to act like an editor instead of a generator. The pages come back tighter and more focused every single time.

You'll get a clickable HTML mockup, not a static image. Real buttons. Real hover states. Something you can put in front of customers tomorrow.

Step 3: Know What It's Bad At (and Use the Right Tool)

Claude Design is great for layouts, copy, and interactive prototypes. It’s also pretty good at creating a consistent design theme (you do have to take the time to configure it).

But it's not perfect.

It doesn't generate photography. You need Midjourney or DALL-E for decent hero images.

And its video / animation generation kind of needs work. But Anthropic has been pretty good about shipping things quickly so I’m sticking here. (IMO it’s a lot more user friendly than, say, Higgsfield).

Here's how the main tools compare for testing landing pages:

• Claude Design: Best for interactive HTML mockups, copy generation, and matching visual references. Strong on editorial judgment. Quick and solid quality.
• Lovable: Better for full-stack web apps with backend logic. Overkill if you just need a landing page.
• v0 by Vercel: Strong on component-level design and Next.js integration. Great if you're already in the Vercel ecosystem. But if you’re a normie business owner…
• Bolt: Fast for full-app prototyping. Less refined for marketing pages specifically.

For testing landing page concepts before you launch? Claude Design wins on speed and editorial quality.

It will NOT implement it for you though. For production builds, you can hand the spec to a developer. There’s some Figma integration but I’ve heard they’re shipping more.

One more warning: It’s pretty token-intensive. But currently Design lives in its own token bucket, so we’re fine. For now.

Go try it out.

It’s one of the final frontiers.

I think you’ll get a lot out of it!